Advanced routing protocols like BGP, OSPF, IS-IS, VXLAN and EVPN on platforms without a paid support option (like Quagga, Mikrotik, FRR).
To me it feels 'wrong' that questions about these protocols, which this people on SE should be able to answer best, are considered off topic only based on the fact that there's no commercial support.
Currently off topic, ...
Yes, I think physical cabling would be on-topic
We've had some questions regarding physical cabling.
The ones which were closed would remain off-topic (home networking, vague, etc) even if physical cabling were on topic. That's good; I'm saying it seems we are already allowing physical cabling.
Cloud-based networking, such as Amazon VPC configuration, NAT gateways, VPN configurations, BGP routing, load balancing, etc. Also Azure virtual networking, and similar offerings by other cloud providers.
Admittedly, there will be overlap with questions on the basic compute and application services these vendors offer, and those would best be answered on ...
Services that are required for normal operation of a network such as DHCP, DNS, RADIUS, etc.
Currently mostly off topic (unless on a platform such as IOS), and should be on topic.
Other related meta discussions: here, here, and here.
Clarification of "protocols above L4 in the OSI model are off-topic" to specifically mention routing and tunnelling protocols, which should all be on-topic.
L2TP is on top of UDP
BGP is on top of TCP
I don't know that anyone would disagree: I'm just trying to make the rules clearer.
Since this is a forum for professional networking, I consider helping people to bypass network policies (for a network over which they have no control) to be unethical. I have to think how I would feel if that were my network since an anonymous OP may actually be a user on my network.
Questions related to bypassing network security or policies, except
More complete answer in response to comments by this user.
Tomato USB based Router - Enterprise features at fraction of price.
Just because a product has "Enterprise features" doesn't make it an enterprise class of device. Certainly either of these firmwares may be arguably better than vendor provided firmwares, but that doesn't make them ...
Certification questions have been deemed off-topic since before beta. In my mind, there is little difference between certification and homework questions, and they should be off topic whether they are multiple choice or not.
Personally, homework questions are a bit worse to me as I am not here to do some college student's homework for them. Getting an ...
I'd like to see virtual host switches (VMware ESXi and MS Hyper-V) added to the 'on' topics.
These switches share a lot of logic with their physical cousins - and need to interface with them - but do have their own flavor.
On-topicness (is that a word?) should be limited to the switch configuration on the host, not including other host configuration items.
I want to add to Brett's position on this, which is:
historical questions are valid as long as there is a way to give a concise, accurate and fact based answer.
We have to draw a line somewhere. Historical questions, like all others, should exhibit a compelling reason to be answered on NE. I could come up with a long list of trivia questions, which ...
Ignoring the "spaminess" of the example, this is a valid concern that I appreciate you have brought forward. I do also want to say this is one that Mike and I have discussed privately, as well as with other moderators from other SE sites.
First, as Mike has noted, we are actually doing very well for a SE site of this age. The stats are generally decent to ...
Overlay networks, such as torrent or bitcoin, should be explicitly off-topic.
There have also been questions about other proprietary or open source overlay networks, but this topic has not been explicitly addressed in the past.
NOTE: Ultimately Stack Exchange concluded that the particular question you asked about is link spam; after investigating the other questions from the same user, I saw that they rapidly posted the same question (including the bogus Cisco PoE switch hyperlinks) across five different Stack Exchange sites. Those hyperlinks were:
Technically incorrect (i.e. ...
The question of which port(s) to use in an application is up to the application developer. The choice of which applications to use is up to the business management. The application deployment is up to the software and server engineers.
None of the above has anything to do with network engineering, and this site is for network engineering. Before Network ...
Interview questions are generally being used to gauge two things: a level of knowledge and how a person thinks.
In the first case, I view this somewhat like test/homework questions (which we don't allow). So my stance personally is about the same as my stance on homework questions. In summary, the actual interview question is a no, but questions about the ...
I would have to say this is off topic on this site, similar to this question: How was the 1965 WAN connection between two computers different than the packet-switched ARPANET?
This fails our previous criteria on historical questions on both points:
The question "what kind of networking protocols might have been in use before ARPANET" is too open ended to ...
As long as you NEVER reveal that you're talking about a residential setting, perhaps. However, the instant the truth is known, the question will instantly, and permanently, be off-topic (aka "closed".) Why? Because there are a million things that go wrong in residential wiring. (often the result of (a) work of people who don't know what they're doing, (b) ...
For the purposes of this answer, let's consider two possible categories of questions:
A-questions. There is a legitimate need for the questions we have already listed as on-topic; furthermore, Stack Exchange offers useful improvements over many network engineering resources which are traditionally mailing lists (i.e. cisco-nsp and such).
B-questions. There ...
The help section is always open to improvement and like many of the SE communities will likely change over time.
1) Why open this forum to purchasing questions which lead to manufacturer recommendations? Isn't that a pandora's box?
If you read further down, product recommendations are explicitly off-topic here (and at most SE sites). While product ...
A specific answer to Ytti's question
No, I disagree. The level of on/off-topic strictness is good.
Remember 'vote to reopen'
Being able to see the moderator's controls, I can tell you that there are basically zero vote-to-reopen requests appearing. (We're only seeing auto-generated reopen requests when the questions are edited to try to bring them on-...
I mostly like YLearn's answer; indeed there are some things about homework questions that are risky:
First, the site is for professional network engineers. The last thing we want is a flood of undergrad (or lower) questions that are trivial for any aspiring CCNA. Physics.SE already has this problem; they started accepting homework questions, and now there ...
I think physical layer is clearly 'on topic'. Its right there at the beginning of the OSI model and its where most troubleshooting begins.
There are also design discussions such as top-of-rack verse middle-of-row data center designs, stack-able switches verse chassis. etc
Linux based and/or open source products often used as routers/gateways/access control for small to medium business (or larger enterprises in niche conditions).
These come to mind quickly as possible examples, but this is not a definitive list: Vyatta, MikroTik, pfSense, PaketFence, or OPNsense.
How to define the scope of such products would have to be a ...
This morning's tally on https://networkengineering.stackexchange.com/:
48 total (on first screen)
I came here to try to grow my understanding of Linux Networking. But now I can see that even if I qualify in the future to ask a Q here, I won't be back. I think this is just too much of an unfriendly group here. There ...
I just upvoted all the posts in this thread. I got a lot out of reading them. Initially, I too shared ytti's opinion about the 'strictness' of posts being closed. But I can see now that I was thinking exactly what Mike and YLearn were warning us of:
Quote from Mike Pennington:
we cannot sacrifice site standards merely to justify our existence
Are host virtualization design or troubleshooting questions on-topic?
Short answer: No.
Host virtualization solutions exist to turn one physical server into many virtual servers. The community overwhelmingly voted purely server questions off-topic .
Could we ever make exceptions for VM questions? Of course, this meta Q&A is intended to cover run-of-...
If I have run cabling at my own home, and am having a specific issue after having made some troubleshooting attempts and observations, is it on topic to present the observations and issue here to ask about the problem?
Home cabling issues are not on-topic on Network Engineering; they are on-topic on Super User; as I mentioned in my comment, our members ...
While the question to which you refer is interesting and thought provoking, I just don't see how that question, or an answer to it, relates to what it says on the Help/On-Topic page, "Network Engineering Stack Exchange is for asking questions about professionally managed networks in a business environment."
I also agree that the answer(s) to this question ...