3

What is the best way forward with answers that are severely edited; to the point where they no longer hold their original intent? In specific, I'm referencing this post:

Roy Royston's Answer

It's signaling the wrong thing to the community, but it's also saying the same thing as what YLearn posted (which has a positive vote talley). On the surface, it appears that YLearn is also saying that this is totally wrong, but after further inspection, the answer has totally backpedalled.

Roy Royston's Extensive Answer Edit

Would the best course of action be to delete the original answer and post a new one? Does that responsibility fall on the person posting, or the community (since it's conveying a confusing message)?

| |
4

I think it's very hard for the community to handle this properly. You can't expect every voter to review his or her voting decision (up or down) after every edit, it just won't happen. The smart thing to do in this case is for the poster not to change a reply so dramatically, but just delete the old answer and post a new one.

| |
  • 1
    Indeed. The site doesn't alert people to edits to down (or up) voted answers / questions. In theory, people aren't supposed to edit an answer into something completely different. – Ricky Beam Jun 30 '15 at 23:40
  • +1 "The smart thing to do in this case is for the poster not to change a reply so dramatically, but just delete the old answer and post a new one." – Craig Constantine Jul 1 '15 at 14:41
0

Actually, as I read the original question, the intent was to match a MAC within an L2TP payload. If that's the case, then Royston's original answer is 100% correct; there's no ACL language to look into the payload of a frame. As such, his edit merely looks like he's trying to copy-cat a positively voted answer.

Verdict: rollback to his original answer, lock if necessary to prevent further "wander edits" (as a last resort)

[Warning: Royston will absolutely flip out over this.]

[edit, to be clear]
Edits should not substantively change an answer. In such cases, one should delete an errant answer, and provide a different one. A downvoted "wrong" answer turned into a "right" answer would still have the downvotes counting against it, making it harder to float to the top as a good answer. (I'm sure that's documented somewhere on SE)

| |
  • To be clear: I'm not questioning the accuracy of the answer, I'm trying to get clarification on posts like this where 2 answers are extremely similar and might cause confusion for people "driving by" for an answer. I couldn't entirely understand the question, which is why I left it be. – Ryan Foley Jul 1 '15 at 4:10
  • I don't think we should be telling users what edits they can make to their own stuff. The fact that things can be drastically edited, and then the existing voters might want to change their votes if they only knew about it -- well, that's just a fact of life with SE. – Craig Constantine Jul 1 '15 at 14:42
  • 1
    In this case, yes we do. If you want to completely change your answer, post a new one and delete the old one. I could swear that was the basic policy of SE. – Ricky Beam Jul 1 '15 at 21:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .