3

I just discovered networkengineering.se. What kinds of questions are appropriate here but not appropriate for Server Fault?

I ask because somebody on Super User just asked a question regarding network administration of a public urban wifi network, and I wasn't sure where to redirect them. The question seems to make sense to me both here and on Server Fault, but Server Fault has a wider user base and more activity, hence a better chance for an answer, while networkengineering seems hyper-specialized - is it a proper subset of Server Fault or does it provide new topics not covered there?

6

SF came along first, and was targeted at IT professionals taking care of servers/networks and has built up a great community. The problem though is that the majority of the site is dedicated to server related questions/problems.

Network professionals didn't tend to frequent the site or consider it a valued resource. NE was started as a place for network professionals to address network questions specifically without having the extra "noise" of questions/answers that weren't necessarily of interest to them.

Is there overlap? Absolutely, and that is often the case within the SE community. Ask Ubuntu is a subset of Unix & Linux which can also overlap with SF. Heck, when you get down to it, there isn't anything you can ask on SF that wouldn't be on topic on Super User.

Neither should the SF community remove networking from their scope. There are many places where the systems administrators will also be in charge of the network. It makes sense for them to use the community that they may be most comfortable with personally. The same is true for Unix/Linux questions.

Since the NE site is still new and in beta, your assertion that SF has a wider user base and more activity is true. However, the counter point is two fold: first that the extra activity could allow a question to more easily "fall through the cracks" and second much of their user base is quite comfortable with servers but not as much with networks.

Here at NE, the user base is clearly network oriented and as long as we keep getting content and users, eventually we will be the clear choice for professional network questions. Until then, I would tend to say the network answers on NE tend to be of better quality than those provided on SF, but SF may often produce a faster answer.

1
  • @MikePennington, I didn't mean to indicate it didn't have any value, rather that most network professionals wouldn't put it in the short list of valuable resources nor was it a site they would frequent. While not always the case, many of the ones I know would tend to skip the SF results on a Google search until they had exhausted the results from Cisco Support/Learning forums, Airheads, etc. – YLearn Jul 2 '14 at 1:54
3

tl;dr NE is focused, SF is more broad

Many of the community members here are also on SF, and I think almost every question here on NE could be asked on SF. But the point of NE is to only cover Net Eng. So the signal-to-noise ratio [for our on-topic material] is vastly higher than on SF. I would be surprised if a question asked here didn't get a better response than on SF.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .