What is the site policy for editing of answers?

This is part of Stack Exchange's design... anyone can edit your posts if they think the edits will improve it.

The policy is outlined in the Help Center, under help/editing... quoting from the Help Center link...

Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than you found it. Common reasons for edits include:

• To fix grammar and spelling mistakes
• To clarify the meaning of the post (without changing that meaning)
• To include additional information only found in comments, so all of the information relevant to the post is contained in one place
• To correct minor mistakes or add updates as the post ages
• To add related resources or hyperlinks

To be specific...

• My edit was to add a hyperlink to Cisco's docs on that command.
• generalnetworkerror's edit seems to fit "clarify the meaning of a post"... it was mostly adding italics (which I think helps readability a bit).

I wrote it, not anyone else, and to change it to fit how you would write it is...well...rude.

Please try not to take it that way... this isn't a slight against your writing style. Honestly, English is complicated and nearly everyone (except perhaps a newspaper copy editor) benefits from an outside eye on their writing. Very often we see our own words through our mind's filter, and they make sense to us; however, other people might not think that same writing is clear enough. That's just one possible reason why anyone in the community can edit your posts.

It's nothing personal... just the community trying to incrementally improve our little site within Stack Exchange.

Is the above a concern for anyone else, or should I just pipe down? Interested in your feedback on this issue.

If you ever have a concern about an edit, you can always roll it back if you don't like it. Also, if you feel that someone is defacing your posts intentionally, you can raise a flag on your answer for a moderator to look at it.

FYI, there are other reasons for edits as well... sometimes people might change their mind about an upvote or a downvote. You can't retract your vote after five minutes unless that post is edited; occasionally others will edit your posts if they want to change their vote.

What is the site policy for editing of answers?

This is part of Stack Exchange's design... anyone can edit your posts if they think the edits will improve it.

The policy is outlined in the Help Center, under help/editing... quoting from the Help Center link...

Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than you found it. Common reasons for edits include:

• To fix grammar and spelling mistakes
• To clarify the meaning of the post (without changing that meaning)
• To include additional information only found in comments, so all of the information relevant to the post is contained in one place
• To correct minor mistakes or add updates as the post ages
• To add related resources or hyperlinks

To be specific...

• My edit was to add a hyperlink to Cisco's docs on that command.
• generalnetworkerror's edit seems to fit "clarify the meaning of a post"... it was mostly adding italics (which I think helps readability a bit).

I wrote it, not anyone else, and to change it to fit how you would write it is...well...rude.

Please try not to take it that way... this isn't a slight against your writing style. Honestly, English is complicated and nearly everyone (except perhaps a newspaper copy editor) benefits from an outside eye on their writing. Very often we see our own words through our mind's filter, and they make sense to us; however, other people might not think that same writing is clear enough. That's just one possible reason why anyone in the community can edit your posts.

It's nothing personal... just the community trying to incrementally improve our little site within Stack Exchange.

Is the above a concern for anyone else, or should I just pipe down? Interested in your feedback on this issue.

If you ever have a concern about an edit, you can always roll it back if you don't like it. Also, if you feel that someone is defacing your posts intentionally, you can raise a flag on your answer for a moderator to look at it.

FYI, there are other reasons for edits as well... sometimes people might change their mind about an upvote or a downvote. You can't retract your vote after five minutes unless that post is edited; occasionally others will edit your posts if they want to change their vote.

What is the site policy for editing of answers?

This is part of Stack Exchange's design... anyone can edit your posts if they think the edits will improve it.

The policy is outlined in the Help Center, under help/editing... quoting from the Help Center link...

Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than you found it. Common reasons for edits include:

• To fix grammar and spelling mistakes
• To clarify the meaning of the post (without changing that meaning)
• To include additional information only found in comments, so all of the information relevant to the post is contained in one place
• To correct minor mistakes or add updates as the post ages
• To add related resources or hyperlinks

To be specific...

• My edit was to add a hyperlink to Cisco's docs on that command.
• generalnetworkerror's edit seems to fit "clarify the meaning of a post"... it was mostly adding italics (which I think helps readability a bit).

I wrote it, not anyone else, and to change it to fit how you would write it is...well...rude.

Please try not to take it that way... this isn't a slight against your writing style. Honestly, English is complicated and nearly everyone (except perhaps a newspaper copy editor) benefits from an outside eye on their writing. Very often we see our own words our mind's filter, and they make sense to us... however, other people might not think that same writing is clear enough. That's just one possible reason why anyone in the community can edit your posts.

It's nothing personal... just the community trying to incrementally improve our little site within Stack Exchange.

Is the above a concern for anyone else, or should I just pipe down? Interested in your feedback on this issue.

If you ever have a concern about an edit, you can always roll it back if you don't like it. Also, if you feel that someone is defacing your posts intentionally, you can raise a flag on your answer for a moderator to look at it.

FYI, there are other reasons for edits as well... sometimes people might change their mind about an upvote or a downvote. You can't retract your vote after five minutes unless that post is edited; occasionally others will edit your posts if they want to change their vote.

What is the site policy for editing of answers?

This is part of Stack Exchange's design... anyone can edit your posts if they think the edits will improve it.

The policy is outlined in the Help Center, under help/editing... quoting from the Help Center link...

Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than you found it. Common reasons for edits include:

• To fix grammar and spelling mistakes
• To clarify the meaning of the post (without changing that meaning)
• To include additional information only found in comments, so all of the information relevant to the post is contained in one place
• To correct minor mistakes or add updates as the post ages
• To add related resources or hyperlinks

To be specific...

• My edit was to add a hyperlink to Cisco's docs on that command.
• generalnetworkerror's edit seems to fit "clarify the meaning of a post"... it was mostly adding italics (which I think helps readability a bit).

I wrote it, not anyone else, and to change it to fit how you would write it is...well...rude.

Please try not to take it that way... this isn't a slight against your writing style. Honestly, English is complicated and nearly everyone (except perhaps a newspaper copy editor) benefits from an outside eye on their writing. Very often we see our own words through our mind's filter, and they make sense to us; however, other people might not think that same writing is clear enough. That's just one possible reason why anyone in the community can edit your posts.

It's nothing personal... just the community trying to incrementally improve our little site within Stack Exchange.

Is the above a concern for anyone else, or should I just pipe down? Interested in your feedback on this issue.

If you ever have a concern about an edit, you can always roll it back if you don't like it. Also, if you feel that someone is defacing your posts intentionally, you can raise a flag on your answer for a moderator to look at it.

FYI, there are other reasons for edits as well... sometimes people might change their mind about an upvote or a downvote. You can't retract your vote after five minutes unless that post is edited; occasionally others will edit your posts if they want to change their vote.